| Poverty is more than a lack of income.
Poverty exists when an individuals or a households access to income, jobs
and/or infrastructure is inadequate or sufficiently unequal to prohibit full access to
opportunities in society. The condition of poverty is caused by a combination of social,
economic, spatial, environmental and political factors (CMC, 1999a). Two other conditions
describe and constitute poverty, namely deprivation and vulnerability. Deprivation
includes isolation and powerlessness while vulnerability means defenselessness, insecurity
and exposure to risk, shocks and stress. Given the cyclical nature of poverty, it is
extremely difficult for the poor to extricate themselves from this predicament. The poor often are the group most vulnerable to
environmental degradation and are most at risk in cases of major flooding, fires,
earthquakes and other hazards. A number of factors serve to compound and re-enforce the
persistence of poverty, namely a lack of access to resources, a lack of access to social
amenities and services, limited capacity and training, and a lack of access to economic
opportunities (refer to Infrastructure). |
|
|
|
| Poverty levels |
Back to top |
| As in other South African cities, poverty in the CMA is socially and
spatially concentrated. The largest concentration of poor households is found in the
south-eastern areas of the CMA. The poverty profile shows discrepancies between recently
urbanized and more established population groupings. The poor live on the most marginal
land often in overcrowded conditions. They lack access to basic services that can have a
deleterious effect upon their health. A poverty profile of the CMA compared to the Durban
and Johannesburg metropolitan areas shows that the CMA has higher levels of poverty, with
32.2%, 30.4% and 20.3% of their respective populations living below the poverty line of
R800 per month per household in 1995 (CMC, 1998). The tables that follow (Table 1, Table
2, Table 3, and Table 4) indicate the
high levels of poverty within the CMA, especially for black households. These tables show
the inequities that exist in terms of employment opportunities, access to sanitation,
refuse removal and telephones within the CMA population. Information pertaining to income,
shelter and energy can be found in Economy: Table 2,
Settlement Patterns: Table 2 and Energy: Table 2 respectively.
|
|
| |
Black |
Coloured |
Indian |
White |
All races |
| Unemployed |
36 |
20 |
9 |
7 |
20 |
| Employed
(formal work) |
64 |
80 |
91 |
93 |
80 |
| Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
|
| NOTE: Weighted analysis of the 1995
October Household Survey. These figures are based on an expanded
definition of (un)employment. The proportion of blacks (36%) in the CMA who
are unemployed is higher than the national proportion of 29%. |
|
(Source: Central Statistical Services, 1996, as cited in CMC,
1999a)
|
|
| |
Black |
Coloured |
Indian |
White |
All races |
| Flush toilet
in dwelling |
24 |
87 |
96 |
95 |
78 |
| Flush toilet
on site |
33 |
7 |
4 |
4 |
11 |
| Toilet off
site (all types) |
30 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
| Other toilet
on site (chemical and bucket) |
9 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
| Pit latrine on
site |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
| None |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
| Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
|
| NOTE: Weighted analysis of the 1995
October Household Survey |
|
(Source: Central Statistical Services, 1996, as cited in CMC,
1999a)
|
|
| |
Black |
Coloured |
Indian |
White |
All races |
| Removed by
local authority |
88 |
94 |
96 |
98 |
94 |
| Communal
refuse dump |
8 |
4 |
4 |
1 |
4 |
| Own refuse
dump |
4 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
| None |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
|
| NOTE: Weighted analysis of the 1995
October Household Survey |
|
(Source: Central Statistical Services, 1996, as cited in CMC,
1999a)
|
|
| |
Black |
Coloured |
Indian |
White |
All races |
| Telephone
and/or cell phone in dwelling |
23 |
59 |
91 |
93 |
65 |
| Access to
neighbours telephone |
6 |
22 |
2 |
2 |
12 |
| Communal
telephone |
37 |
6 |
2 |
1 |
10 |
| Access to
telephone in shop / clinic |
16 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
5 |
| None |
18 |
10 |
4 |
4 |
9 |
| Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
|
| NOTE: Weighted analysis of the 1995
October Household Survey |
|
(Source: Central Statistical Services, 1996, as cited in CMC,
1999a)
|
| Levels of living |
Back to top |
| There is great difference in levels of living between residential areas in
the CMA. The level of living index, based on 1991 Census data, refers to the composite
index of five indicators, namely income, education, unemployment, welfare and over-
crowding. Table 5 gives the suburb with the highest and lowest
rating of this index for each metropolitan local council. Higher indices indicate poorer
living conditions. The levels of living index ranges from high quality living environments
in Llandudno (2.4) to poor living environments in Kuilsriver (55.8), Browns Farm
(51.1) and Khayelitsha (49.0). |
|
| METROPOLITAN
LOCAL COUNCIL |
SUBURB |
INDEX |
| Blaauwberg |
Marconi Beam |
48.0 |
| |
Melkbosstrand |
3.1 |
| City of Cape Town |
Brown's Farm |
51.1 |
| |
Pinelands |
3.8 |
| City of Tygerberg |
Khayelitsha |
49.0 |
| |
Loevenstein |
3.3 |
| Helderberg |
Sir Lowry's Pass |
41.0 |
| |
Somerset West |
5.9 |
| Oostenberg |
Kuilsrivier |
55.8 |
| |
Windsor Park |
3.7 |
| South Peninsula |
Lavender Hill |
41.0 |
| |
Llandudno |
2.4 |
|
| NOTE: Based on 1991 Census data |
|
(Source: CMC, 1997) |
| The following overcrowding statistics are based on the 1991 Census. The
percentage of overcrowding per suburb is based on more than 1.5 persons per habitable
room, including the lounge and dining room, but excluding the kitchen. The highest levels
of overcrowding were recorded at Browns Farm (89%) and Nyanga and Crossroads (80%)
indicating high levels of overcrowding. The least crowded suburbs were Bishopscourt
(0.73%) and Claremont (1.3%). The suburbs of Lavender Hill, Hout Bay and Langa displayed
intermediate levels of overcrowding with 49%, 55% and 66% respectively. Map 1 provides a spatial representation of the overcrowding index
in 1991. |
(Source:
CMC, 1999) |
Back to top |