SoE Home
infocont.gif (3149 bytes) State of the Environment
Waste
About the CMA
Lack of adequate waste management is currently a problem throughout South Africa. The CMA is no exception. Rapid population and urban growth is generating increasing amounts of waste. Furthermore, the only nuclear energy plant in South Africa is situated with in the metropolitan area. Unless steps are taken to properly monitor and control the generation and disposal of waste across all sectors, and to provide well-managed disposal and recycling facilities, the problem of waste will continue to pose an increasing threat to human health and the environment.

There are various forms of waste being generated in the CMA, including solid (mostly domestic in origin), hazardous and liquid  waste. Of the waste entering the official waste stream, three percent is hazardous industrial, nine percent is non-hazardous industrial, and 88% municipal (Nowicki and Pressend, 1998). These arise from the many domestic and economic activities in the CMA and as a result it makes the disposal, management and monitoring of waste particularly challenging.

Contents of CONTEXTUAL INFO on Waste:
Solid waste

Back to top

At present data on volumes of solid waste generated in the CMA is incomplete and inconsistent resulting in discrepancies in volume figures. Solid waste generated in the CMA boundaries is currently estimated between 738 183 tons per annum (t/a) (Waste Management Department, CMC) and over 1 million t/a based on a waste generation per capita of approximately 1kg per day for 2 800 000 people (Parsons, 1997). Table 1 below provides a break down of solid waste generated by municipality.

 

Table 1

Current waste generated by municipality

Back to top

MUNICIPALITY

POPULATION, 1996

TOTAL SOLID WASTE GENERATED, t/a*

Cape Town

1 053 400

283 252

South Municipality

354 150

141 974

Blaauwberg

133 150

51 734

Tygerberg

928 150

130 416

Helderberg

138 310

67 327

Oostenberg

268 390

63 480

CMC Total

2 875 480

738 183

(Source: Adapted from Wright-Pierce, 1998)

Landfill sites in the Cape Metropolitan Area

Back to top

At present there are seven operating ‘general waste’ landfill sites in the CMA, with CMC responsible for six sites (Table 2 and Map 1). Enviroserv, a private waste management company, operates a general and hazardous waste site at Vissershok on the outskirts of the CMA. Of the seven landfill sites, three are currently permitted and therefore satisfy the Minimum Requirements for Waste Disposal by Landfill (DWAF, 1994). There are 37 known closed landfill sites throughout the CMA. Most of the sites were poorly sited and were badly managed during their operational life (Nowicki and Pressend, 1998). The current financial cost of landfilling alone is between R30 – R100 per ton (Wright-Pierce, 1998). According to the National Waste Management Strategy Draft Report of 17 December 1998, all incinerators that are not permitted by the year 2005 must be closed down.

 

Table 2

Status of landfill sites in the CMA

Back to top

NAME OF

SITE

LOCATION

LIFE

SPAN

REMAINING AIR SPACE

M3

WASTE TYPES ACCEPTED

VOLUMES (TONS/AN)*

SOIL

CLASS

LICENSED/

PERMIT

Coastal Park

Muizenberg

2013

2 900 000

Mixed Household

176 000

Sandy

G:L:B+

Applied

EIA phase

Vissershok CMC

Frankdale

Road

2027

11 000 000

General/

Hazardous

290 800

Clay

HH, Hh, G:L:B+

Permitted 98

Vissershok WMF

Frankdale

Road

2010

2 000 000

Hazardous

171 000

Clay

HH, Hh, L:B+

Permitted-97

Swartklip

Khayelitsha

2000

800 000

General

245 000

Sandy

G:L:B+

Applied

(Closure)

Bellville (Sacks Circle)

Bellville South

2005

2 900 000

Household, Industry

59 200

Sandy

G:M:B+

Applied

Brackenfell

Brackenfell

2002

49 000

Household, Trade

14 300

Granite rock

G:M:B+

Permitted-95

Faure (Blue Downs)

Blue Downs

2000

 

General

20 000

 

G:M:B+

None

*NOTE: Compiled from Waste Disposal in and around the Cape Metropole, Parson and Associates, June 1997 and other sources.

(Source: Adapted from Wright-Pierce, 1998)

 

Litter

Back to top

At least four million items of litter per day can be found in the greater Cape Town area, two million of this being plastics (Ryan and Moloney, 1994). Plastics are persistent, accumulative pollutants. Being lightweight, they are easily dispersed far from source areas by wind and water. For instance, it is estimated that up to 239 kg/day of plastic bags enter stormwater drains. The different types and lightweight nature of plastic complicate recycling. The cost to collect street litter is roughly eight times that of containerised litter (Ryan and Swanepoel, 1996). The negative impact on the tourist industry resulting from litter is a hidden economic cost.

 

Table 3

Household Waste Composition (as a % of total*) in the CMA waste stream.

Back to top

TYPE

HIGH INCOME

(AVERAGE)

MIDDLE INCOME

(AVERAGE)

LOW INCOME

Paper/Cardboard

12.16

26.49

17.35

Glass bottles other glass

8.47

5.13

6.12

Metal/beverage cans

4.24

6.41

8.16

Non Ferrous metal

3.19

0.00

0.00

Plastic

17.44

21.79

27.55

Kitchen Waste

4.76

8.97

8.16

Garden Waste

33.35

14.10

5.10

Timber

4.26

0.00

2.04

Textiles

2.64

2.56

12.24

Rubber

0.00

0.00

0.00

Builder’s rubble

0.00

0.00

0.00

Fines

7.94

11.54

13.27

Household hazardous

1.59

0.00

0.00

Other

0.00

0.00

0.00

Total

100

100

100

*The % of waste composition from available data does not indicate if the waste was measured in weight, volume or items.

(Source Wright-Pierce, 1998)

Recycling

Back to top

Approximately 15 500 t/a of glass, 300 000 t/a of metal and 160 000 t/a of paper is currently recycled in the CMA (Nowicki and Pressend, 1998). The composting of municipal solid waste takes place at three facilities in the CMA, namely the Bellville and Radnor Plants managed by the City of Tygerberg and the Mitchells Plain Plant managed by the CMC. Approximately 49 000 t/a of compost is produced. No accurate figures are available for plastic.

 

Figure 1: Resource recovery and municipal waste as a proportion of total waste generated

fig6-26.jpg (5060 bytes)

(Source: Nowicki and Pressend, 1998)

Hazardous waste

Domestic and small business

Back to top

The Coastal Park, Faure, Bellville and the Swartkip landfill sites currently receive hazardous waste from domestic sources and small business, despite them not being lined nor permitted to receive such waste. According to the Solid Waste Feasibility Study (Wright-Pierce, 1998), 1 - 2% of domestic waste is hazardous. Using this as a guideline, it can estimated that of the 176 000 t/a of waste entering the Coastal Park landfill site (Table 6.9), between 2 000 – 4 000 tons are hazardous.
Medical waste

Back to top

The total quantity of medical waste currently incinerated in the CMA is estimated at 1700 t/a, approximately a third of all medical waste generated. Approximately 30% of medical waste generated is not disposed of at the two permitted medical waste incinerators.

According to a medical waste survey of 910 medical waste generators (PAWC 1999), 86% of medical waste is disposed of in a proper way. The remaining 14% of medical waste is disposed of in an unsafe way, either by being burnt, buried, discharged into the sewer system or dumped into municipal waste. The majority of this waste (85%) is disposed of in municipal waste. It was found that 93% of medical waste generators surveyed stored their waste safely and 94% separated medical waste from other waste. In spite of the Occupational Health and Safety Act requiring employers to have a health and safety policy in place to safeguard their employees against occupational hazards, only 73% of the generators surveyed had such a policy in place. It was found that 88% of all medical waste handlers in the survey sample had some form of training.

The total quantity of medical waste currently generated by Provincial hospitals in the Cape Metropolitan Region is estimated at 139 182 kg per month (PAWC, 1999), all of which is incinerated. It is estimated that private hospitals in the CMA generate 72 660kg per month, based on 1kg per hospital bed per day.

There are two medical waste incinerators in the CMA currently permitted by the Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism. The Enviroserv incinerator at Vissershok and a smaller one at Delft operated by BCL. Enviroserv are contracted to remove medical wastes from about 75% (± 110) of hospitals in the CMA. This incineration facility has the capacity to burn approximately 1680 to 1920 t/a and currently receives 1 200 t/a (Parsons, 1997). Other medical waste incinerators are linked to hospitals and burn about 500 t/a. These existed prior to 1989 when the Clean Air Act was passed and may operate whilst in the process of either acquiring a permit or of closure. According to the National Waste Management Strategy Draft Report of 17 December 1998, all incinerators that are not permitted by the year 2002 must be closed down.

Nuclear waste

Back to top

Waste from Koeberg Nuclear Power Station includes:
  • Gaseous waste, routinely released into the atmosphere;
  • Liquid discharges into the sea;
  • Low-level solid waste such as protective clothing;
  • Medium-level solid waste such as contaminated filters, resins and equipment; and
  • High-level waste in the form of spent fuel.

Low- and medium-level waste is accumulated on-site in specially designed drums until a truckload can be transported out of the CMA to the permanent repository at Vaalputs in the Northern Cape Province. Low-level and intermediate-level wastes are stored in steel and concrete drums respectively. Waste volumes generated in these categories in the year 1996/7 amounted to 1560m3, comprising 1045m3 in metal drums and 515m3 in concrete drums (Council for Nuclear Safety, 1998). High-level waste consists of highly radioactive spent fuel. There is at present no national policy for dealing with highly radioactive waste; neither has Eskom made public its plans for a long-term solution to the problem. In the interim, the waste is stored underwater in a 'pool' on site. There is currently a concern that storage space is running out which has given rise to a proposal by Eskom to double the onsite storage space.

Liquid

Back to top

There are four main sources of liquid waste in the CMA, namely raw sewage, industrial effluent, and treated effluent from sewage treatment plants and stormwater run-off. Data regarding stormwater run-off was not available at the time this report was drafted.
Raw sewage and treated effluent

Back to top

There are 21 treatment plants as well as numerous pipelines, interceptor sewers and pump stations in the CMA (Map 1) (Nowicki and Pressend, 1998). These receive human waste and both treated and untreated industrial wastewater. Industrial discharge for small industries is regulated by the local authorities that levy a charge based on volume, ‘strength’ and toxicity level. Larger industries using more than 150 kilolitres of water per day require a waste water disposal permit from Department Water Affairs and Forestry (DWAF) and must pre-treat effluent, if necessary, prior to discharging it into the sewer.

Wastewater in the sewers is predominantly comprehensively treated before being discharged into rivers, waterbodies and the sea. Treatment is wherever possible augmented by maturation ponds through which effluent from the treatment works passes and improves in quality by retention and natural bacteriological degradation.

At the three marine outfalls in Hout Bay, Green Point and Camps Bay, pre-treatment of sewage comprises the removal of rough screenings and the maceration of fine solids prior to pumping out through the 1.5km - 1.75km long submarine pipelines. The combined wastewater discharge via these marine outfalls is 6.5% of the total wastewater treated in the CMA. The Mitchells Plain, Cape Flats and Llandudno treatment works also discharge treated effluent directly into the sea. Of the 528 Ml of effluent being produced per day, 8% is being reused. The treatment of sewage produces large quantities of a solids/liquid mixture or sludge (Table 4). Water forms some 99% of raw sludge. Most dewatered or dry sewage sludge is currently landfilled but when stabilised, dried and compliant with certain metal level standards, it has potential for use as soil conditioner for agricultural purposes.

 

Table 4

Wastewater sludge production from CMA treatment plants

Back to top

YEAR

AS DRY SLUDGE

(t/a)

AS WET SLUDGE

(t/a)

PROJECTED

ANNUAL INCREASE

1998

44 383

234 947

 

2030

187 807

772 717

5%

(Source: Wright-Pierce, 1998)

Industrial effluent

Back to top

A few large industrial facilities discharge their treated wastewater directly into the marine environment via pipelines or outlets. This discharge can be directly into the surf zone or via deep-sea pipelines. There are a number of such industrial outlets in the CMA. Both the Caltex Oil Refinery and Kynoch Fertiliser Limited operate deep-sea pipelines into Table Bay. The Marine Oil Refinery discharges into the surf zone near Simonstown and Somchem has five small pipelines discharging into the surf zone near Macassar. These discharge arrangements require a permit from the DWAF.

Back to top


See All other Contextual Information