SoE Home
infocont.gif (3149 bytes) State of the Environment
Water
About the CMA
Water is important for human survival and ecosystem functioning. Water resources can be divided into six interrelated categories: sources or headwaters; rivers; wetlands; estuaries; groundwater and human-made facilities, all of which form part of catchments. Catchments in the CMA display a high seasonal variability, given that the CMA receives most of its rain in the winter months (see Climate).

 

Contents of CONTEXTUAL INFO on Water:
Catchments

Back to top

A catchment is the area that drains water to a common point and is largely influenced by climate, terrain and geology. Water flowing over sandstone-derived soils has low nutrient levels, conductivities and pH, while rivers flowing over shales have higher values. There are 10 major and four minor catchments in the CMA. Map 1 shows their location.
Headwaters

Back to top

The upper reaches of a river are referred to as the headwaters or the mountain stream zone. Headwaters are generally steep gradient, high-energy (turbulent flow) systems. Water quality is pure, and in the Western Cape Province, nutrient levels, conductivities and pH are low (conductivities < 3.0 milliSiemens per metre (mS m-1); pH < 6). They originate at fairly high altitudes and provide a habitat for rare and endemic species (Picker and Samways, 1996).

In general sources and headwaters of the rivers of the CMA are relatively undisturbed and in a good ecological state, however, they are sensitive to anthropogenic disturbance. Several upper catchments within the CMA are planted with pine trees, usually Pinus pinaster, that reduce runoff. Little documented information exists on the current state of headwaters of the CMA’s rivers.

Rivers

Back to top

The specific state of the rivers in the CMA varies greatly between catchments, depending largely on the degree of urbanization within the catchment (Inland Waters Management Team, 1994). As rivers are longitudinal, unidirectional systems, effects of stresses accumulate in the middle and lower reaches of the river. Most of the research undertaken has focused on these reaches. Therefore, in general, quality of the water in the rivers and streams arising in the mountains in the CMA is good. As streams pass from the footslopes into lower-lying areas where urban and industrial developments dominate the landscape, water quality is influenced by the quality of run off arising from these areas.

In 1991, rivers in seven major catchments in the CMA received effluent from sewage works (Bergman and Partners, 1991). As a result, many of the rivers of the CMA show signs of organic pollution (measured in terms of faecal coliform content). The European Union uses a potable standard of zero cells of E. coli (an indicator species) per 100 ml, while for recreation the standard is 1 000 cells per 100 ml (CCC, 1994, 1996).

High levels of faecal coliforms usually result from runoff from informal and inadequately serviced areas, leakages in pipes, overflows from pump stations and treated and untreated effluent flows from sewage treatment works. There are also less obvious sources of faecal pollution, such as:
  • soil contamination by animal faecal pollution (e.g. in rural/farming areas);
  • runoff from residential areas may also be contaminated with faecal bacteria and pathogens; and,
  • water bodies are occasionally polluted by people using them specifically for ablution purposes.

The recreational potential of rivers in the CMA is limited by these pollution levels. Table 1 shows a dramatic increase in the faecal coliform counts of a number of rivers in the CMA in recent years (also see Table 4).

Table 1

Faecal coliform counts at points in the Cape Metropolitan Area

Back to top

River Faecal coliforms/100 ml percentiles*

1993/4

1995/6

Liesbeek River @ Bishopscourt

150

100

Liesbeek River @ Hartleyvale

630

2400

Black River @ Raapenberg Pump Station

600 000

63000

Black River @ Maitland

76 000

22 000

Black River mouth

10 000

9000

Elsieskraal River @ Pinelands

8000

22 000

Vygekraal River above Athlone Sewage Works

23 000

600 000

Vygekraal River below Athlone Sewage Works

88 000

110 000

Langa Canal @ Settlers Way

26 000

2 400 000

Little Lotus River

2000

6000

Big Lotus River

5000

39 000

* values below which 50% of measurements lie, i.e. this provides a median value.

(Source: adapted from CCC, 1994, 1996 by Snaddon, 1998)

 

Many of the rivers in the CMA suffer from habitat loss due to canalisation (Table 2). Other forms of riverine habitat destruction affecting rivers in the CMA include encroachment by farmlands and urban development. Of particular note are the Eerste, Lourens and Diep rivers that have been affected by farming, and the Eerste, Liesbeek, and Lourens rivers by urban development.

 

Table 2

Extent (in kilometres) of canalisation of rivers in the Cape Metropolitan Area

Back to top

River

Non-canalised river channel (km)

Canalised section (km)

Diep

75

1-1.5

Mosselbank

33

-

Klapmuts

31.5

-

Sout

14

-

Sir Lowry’s Pass

13.6

-

Lourens

20

-

Eerste

34

4

Kuils

28

2.8

Bottelary

15

-

Salt

   

Black

5.3

6.8

Elsieskraal

10.7

12.8

Vygekraal

5.2

3.2

Liesbeek

8.2

2.8

Keyser

12.1

8

Diep/Sand

22

8

Silvermine

12.3

-

Disa

10.5

-

(Source: Adapted from Bergman and Partners, 1991)
A report produced by Southern Waters at UCT presents the findings of an ecological assessment of 37 rivers in the CMA (Day, Harding and Brown, 1999). The 37 rivers assessed fell into four sub-regional categories, namely:
  • Mountain stream (7 sub-regions assessed)
  • Foothill (16 sub-regions assessed)
  • Wetland transitional (37 sub-regions assessed)
  • Lower river (8 sub-regions assessed)

This study was largely a qualitative assessment of biotic and abiotic factors, which determine the ecological status of rivers in the CMA. Table 3 below presents the six ecological status classes to which the sub-regions of rivers were assigned. The classes reflect the degree of "naturalness" of the rivers.

 

Table 3

Ecological Status Classes

Back to top

STATUS CLASS DESCRIPTION
Class 1 100% of potential value; unmodified, natural.
Class 2 80-99% of potential value; largely natural with few modifications. A small change in natural habitats and biota may have taken place, but the assumption is that ecosystem functioning is essentially unchanged.
Class 3 60-79% of potential value; moderately modified. A loss and change of natural habitat and biota has occurred, but basic ecosystem functioning appears to be predominantly unchanged.
Class 4 40-59% of potential value; largely modified. A loss of natural habitat and taxa and a reduction in basic ecosystem functioning has occurred.
Class 5 20-39% of potential value; seriously modified. The loss of natural habitat, taxa and ecosystem functioning is extensive.
Class 6 0-19% of potential value; modifications have reached a critical level and there has been an almost complete loss of natural habitat and biota. In the worst cases, basic ecosystem functioning no longer exists.
* values below which 50% of measurements lie, i.e. this provides a median value.
(Source: Day, Harding and Brown, 1999)

 


Ecological status of assessed sites differentiated in terms of their classifications as:

(Source: Day, Harding and Brown, 1999)

Figure 1

Back to top

Mountain Stream

fig3-5a.gif (4355 bytes)
A: Mountain stream

Lour1=Lourens River; HB1/HB2=Hout Bay River; SM1/SM2=Silvermine River; GB1=Grootboschkloof; Diep1=Diep River (Constantia); ST1=Simonstown River.

Figure 2

Back to top

Foothill river

fig3-5b.gif (6608 bytes)
B: Foothill river

SM3=Silvermine River; SL1=Sir Lowry’s Pass River; SP1=Spaanschemat River; Wlake1=Westlake River; HB3/HB4=Hout Bay; Lour2/Lour3=Lourens River; GB2=Grootboschkloof; Diep2=Diep River; Brom=Brommersvlei River; Bur=Burgersbos River; PK1=Prinskasteel River; Liesb1/Liesb2=Liesbeek River; ST2=Simonstown River; Bok1=Bokramspruit River.

Figure 3

Back to top

Wetland Traditional Rivers

fig3-5c.gif (13324 bytes)

Figure 4

Back to top

Lowland Rivers

fig3-5d.gif (4964 bytes)

D1/D2/D3/D4/D5=Diep River (Rietvlei); Mossel4/Mossel5=Mosselbank River; Eerste/1Eerste2=Eerste River; Liesb3=Liesbeek River; Black1/Black2/Black3=Black River.
Estuaries

Back to top

An estuary is the ecosystem that defines the area where a river meets the sea. The most important estuaries in the CMA in terms of their nursery function for marine fish include the Milnerton Lagoon on the Diep River, Sandvlei and the Eerste River Estuary. There are 11 estuaries around the CMA coastline, namely:
  • Sout
  • Diep (Milnerton Lagoon)
  • Salt
  • Disa
  • Wildevoëlvlei
  • De Mond
  • Silvermine
  • Sandvlei (mouth is canalised)
  • Eerste
  • Lourens
  • Steenbras
These estuaries vary in terms of their ecological state, depending on their proximity to urban development. In addition, estuaries also suffer the cumulative effects of upstream perturbations such as pollution. Most have retained their natural characteristics, while others, mostly the larger estuaries such as the Diep, Eerste and Sandvlei, have physically been altered and polluted (Snaddon, 1998).
Wetlands

Back to top

Wetlands are valuable habitats, in terms of the role they play in the maintenance of water quality and flood attenuation (Silberbauer and King, 1991). Wetlands are efficient assimilators of excess nutrients, particularly phosphates and nitrates due to the nature of the vegetation and fine sediments. There are many wetlands within the CMA, ranging in size and state. The larger wetlands or vleis are situated towards the river mouths and include:
  • Zeekoeivlei, Little Princessvlei and Princessvlei, and Rondevlei (Big Lotus/Little Lotus catchment)
  • Zandvlei (Diep/Sand catchment) - also included in the list of estuaries
  • Rietvlei (Diep catchment) - a highly threatened saltmarsh habitat
  • Wildevoëlvlei (Noordhoek catchment)

Seasonal wetlands in the CMA include:

  • Blouvlei,
  • Noordhoek Saltpan, and
  • Pans behind the Cape Flats sewage works, below Rondevlei, and within the Silvermine Reserve.

Wetlands in the CMA have been the most affected by pollution, loss of habitat and hydrological and physical alteration. Many of the small perennial and seasonal wetlands have been filled in or "reclaimed" for development or badly polluted. Figure 5  provides a class classification of the larger vleis according to their Habitat Integrity Index. It should be noted that trophic levels are of greater ecological significance in summer when water levels are low and temperatures are high.

 

Figure 5

Back to top

Classes assigned to estuaries and wetlands in the Cape Metropolitan Area based on Habitat Integrity Assessment Scores

fig3-6.gif (5208 bytes)

(Source: Day, Harding and Brown, 1999)

 

Table 4 below presents water quality measurements for dissolved oxygen, pH, ammonia, phosphorus and faecal coliform for a selection of rivers and vleis in the in the CMA from July 1997 to June 1998.

 

Table 4

Water quality measurements for a selection of rivers and vleis in the Cape Metropolitan Area

Back to top

Selected rivers and vleis

Dissolved oxygen

pH

Ammonia

Phosphorus

Faecal coliform

Sand River

(below confluence of Langvlei/Sand canals)

79

7.8

0.10

0.025

3 000

Keysers River

(at Military Road, Steenberg)

52

7.4

0.04

0.019

1 100

Westlake River

(At corner Chenel and Main Road)

60

7.4

0.08

0.018

270

Zandvlei

(vlei centre)

94

8.4

0.05

0.008

100

Zandvlei

(outlet channel)

86

8.0

-

-

-

Marina da Gama

(at Visitors’ Bureau)

86

8.4

-

-

80

Big Lotus River

(at 5th Avenue, Grassy Park)

110

8.4

0.38

0.352

36 000

Little Lotus River

(at 5th Avenue, Grassy Park)

94

8.3

0.06

0.071

5 000

Zeekoeivlei

(in Home Bay)

120

9.7

-

-

240

Zeeloeivlei

(opposite Peninsula Aquatic Club)

110

9.4

0.02

0.274

340

Princessvlei

(vlei centre)

93

8.4

0.20

0.019

60

Little Princessvlei

(south point in vlei)

60

7.7

0.11

0.025

1 000

Liesbeek River

(at Winchester Road, Bishopscourt)

97

7.48

0.08

0.014

250

Liesbeek River

(opposite Hartleyvale)

75

7.53

0.12

0.014

5 000

Jakkalsvlei River

(near Settlers Way)

90

8.02

7.71

5.50

42 000

Fygekraal River

(upstream of Athlone WWTW)

67

7.83

6.25

2.38

200 000

Fygekraal River

(downstream of Athlone WWTW)

64

7.66

4.13

1.85

120 000

Black River

(near Raapenberg Pump Station)

47

7.59

2.21

1.46

13 000

Black River

(Mouth)

79

7.85

0.78

0.966

8 000

NOTE: This data is extracted from the Cape Metropolitan Council Directorate:Water and Waste Annual Report, July 1997-June 1998. (Source: CMC, 1998a)
EXPLANATORY NOTE:

Dissolved oxygen is essential for all aquatic life. The amount of oxygen dissolved in water may vary with time of day, season, altitude, temperature, salt content and other environmental factors. Organisms exposed to dissolved oxygen levels less than 40% for extended periods will tend to suffer severe adverse effects.

pH is measured on a scale of 1-14 and indicates how alkaline (pH>7) or acidic (pH<7) the water is. Water with a pH of 7 is neutral. Most aquatic life can tolerate pH in a range from approximately 6 to 8. Streams flowing through areas vegetated with Fynbos tend to have low pH to which biota has adapted.

Ammonia usually occurs in low concentrations in natural waters. It is a common pollutant associated with sewage and industrial effluents. Ammonia occurs in two chemical forms, namely unionized ammonia, which can be toxic to aquatic life, and the ammonium ion. The relative amount of the toxic form increases at high pH and high temperatures. The General Limit for ammonia in effluent discharges is 2mg/l.

Phosphorus is measured in its soluble reactive form, which is the portion of total phosphorus available and actively used by aquatic plants and algae. High levels of phosphorus will tend to promote rapid plant growth, while concentrations less than 0.005mg/l are considered sufficiently low to reduce the likelihood of algal or other plant growth. Sources of phosphorus include detergents, fertilizers and sewage.

Faecal coliform results are depicted as percentiles, which indicate that 50% of the samples taken have faecal coliform counts less than and equal to the figure listed for that sample point. The Target Water Quality Range for "full-contact" recreation (swimming) is 0 to 130 counts per 100 ml and 1 to 1 000 counts per 100 ml for "intermediate-contact" recreation. Above these levels, the risk of gastrointestinal effects increases.


Groundwater

Back to top

There are three significant aquifers within the CMA: the Newlands aquifer, the Atlantis aquifer and the Cape Flats aquifer. The sandy substrate of the Cape Flats and Atlantis areas has a low filtering efficiency and, as groundwater is recharged by slow seepage from the surface, this water resource is particularly vulnerable to pollution from human activities.

The water quality in the Newlands aquifer is relatively good and uncontaminated. Currently, approximately 3.6 x 106 m3 of water per annum is extracted from this aquifer, for irrigation of sports fields and for the Ohlssons Brewery (Western Cape System Analysis, 1994). It has been identified as a potential source of water for the CMA.

The Cape Flats aquifer is of variable, and to some extent, unknown, water quality. Variable amounts of water are abstracted on an ad hoc basis. Illegal dumping of waste at industrial and building sites throughout the Cape Flats poses a threat to this aquifer.

The Atlantis aquifer is used most intensively, and the water supply for the town of Atlantis is abstracted from this source. Thus, most monitoring and exploratory work has been focused here. The Atlantis aquifer currently yields approximately 5.5 x 106 m3 per annum (Cavé et al, 1996). The Atlantis aquifer is considered to be polluted, and is threatened by industrial contamination, in particular by iron precipitation even though the main aquifer is 2-3 km away from the major industrial area (Snaddon, 1998).

Human-made resources

Back to top

Much of the CMA’s water supply has been diverted from rivers that are located beyond its boundaries. The water is brought into the CMA via inter-basin water transfer schemes (IBTs). The Riviersonderend/Berg River Government Water Scheme regulates the flows from the Riviersonderend, the Berg River and the Eerste River for urban, industrial and agricultural use (see Table 5). The Palmiet River Scheme (Phase I) was completed in mid-1998 and has commenced with the transfer of water from the Palmiet River via the Palmiet Pumped Storage Scheme to the Steenbras Upper Dam and ultimately to the CMA.

During summer, algal blooms threaten some of the reservoirs in these catchments. The water from these sources requires extensive treatment before consumption and this is a costly and time-consuming process. Sewage ponds and reservoirs, although unnatural, provide habitat for aquatic fauna and flora.

Currently, water supply and utilisation are measured in terms of quantities. Table 6 shows the water supplied by the CMC to the MLCs for 1997/1998. The metropolitan meterage system is currently being extended to measure water consumption and calculate the amount of water that is unaccounted for. In 1993/1994, figures for the City of Cape Town, which then included the South Peninsula area, indicated a total consumption of 109 893 155 kl with 22.8% of this being unaccounted for (Cape Town City Council, City Engineer, 1994).

 

Table 5

Supply of water to the Cape Metropolitan Area, showing supply catchments and reservoirs and the percentage of supply from July 1993 to June 1996

Back to top

RESERVOIR

RIVER

PERCENTAGE OF SUPPLY TO THE CMA

1993/4 1994/5 1995/6
CMA catchments:
- Liesbeek (Albion Springs)

-

0.1

0.3

*Hely Hutchinson, Woodhead, De Villiers, Victoria, Alexandra Table Mountain rivers

1.3

1.2

1.3

Catchments beyond the CMA:
Steenbras Steenbras

13.7

10.4

11.5

Wemmershoek Berg

21.5

21

20.2

Voëlvlei Berg

25.6

25.6

22.2

Theewaterskloof Riviersonderend

37.9

41.7

44.5

* The total volume from these sources comprises 3.7 x 106 m3 yr-1, compared to 185.9 x 106 m3 yr-1 from catchments beyond the boundary of the CMA.

(Source: CCC, 1994 and 1996)

Table 6

Water supplied to local authorities (1 July 1997 to 30 June 1998) by CMC

Back to top

Local authority

Amount

(kl)

Blaauwberg Municipality

27 985 557

City of Cape Town

95 160 582

Helderberg Municipality

11 371 496

Oostenberg Municipality

20 310 808

South Peninsula Municipality

42 328 905

City of Tygerberg

82 828 004

Total

279 985 352

NOTE: The figures for new Metropolitan Local Councils include estimates as the separation of the network is not yet completed. Riparian owners and other private consumers are not included in the above figures.

(Source: CMC Water Department, 1998)

Back to top


See All other Contextual Information