Go to Documents contents   Response by Marthinus van Schalkwyk, South African Minister of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, to the G8 Declaration on Climate Change, 8 July 2008

08 July 2008

Media Statement

Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism

TUESDAY, 08 JULY 2008: South Africa has noted the G8 Statement on Climate Change. While the Statement may appear as a movement forward, we are concerned that it may, in effect, be a regression from what is required to make a meaningful contribution to meeting the challenges of climate change.

We came to Hokkaido with the expectation that the eight major industrialised economies of the world would demonstrate leadership on the climate change issue.

The long term global goal for emission reductions of 50% by 2050 falls below what is scientifically required to stabilise the atmosphere at a relatively safe level. To be meaningful and credible, a long term goal must have a base year, it must be underpinned by ambitious mid-term targets and actions and it should be based on an equitable burden-sharing paradigm.

As it is expressed in the G8 statement, the long term goal is an empty slogan without substance.

We know very well that there are many countries in the G8 grouping that share our ambitious expectations, and therefore it is regrettable that the lowest common denominator in the G8 determined the level of ambition in the G8 Declaration on climate change.

The ambitious package that South Africa is striving for has three elements:

  • Firstly, for the global community to seriously consider a long term global goal for emission reductions of at least 50% by 2050 compared to 1990 levels, we believe the G8 industrialised countries should resolve to lead with reductions of between 80% and 95% below 1990 levels by mid-century;
  • Secondly, absolute emission reductions based on mid-term targets toward the upper end of the range of 25% to 40% below 1990 levels by 2020 for all developed countries - with the emphasis on all developed countries;
  • And finally, substantial deviations below business-as-usual baselines in some developing country regions by 2020 and in all regions by 2050.

    This offer comes as a political package. To display integrity, a long term goal must have a base year and it must be underpinned by clearly-defined mid-term targets. Only on that basis can we all agree on the global goal.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------