| To assess the capability of an air quality
management plan it is necessary to answer three key questions:
- Have the air quality objectives been stated, and are they realistic and
appropriate ?
- To what extent is information required by decision makers to develop management
strategies available to them; is it being used in the most effective manner; and is it of
adequate quality for its intended use?
- Is there an administrative and legislative framework to ensure that emission
control strategies will be implemented and enforced ?
Air Quality Management Capability Indicators
In assessing the capability of an air quality management plan it is important to
make use of indicators. The target audience for indicators in this case would be decision
makers concerned with the air quality in Greater Johannesburg. The indicators are intended
as an aid for decision makers to identify deficiencies in the capabilities of the air
quality monitoring programme.
In the study four sets of indicators (indices) have been developed to represent
the principle components of management capability namely:
Criteria for indicator development
Each of the four indices consists of a number of component
indicators to determine if the city has any useful capacity with respect to a particular
element of management capability. Indicators were quantified by allocating points for each
indicator question with a difference in weighing of points based on the importance of the
capability. The total number of indicator points available in each component index is 25.
These were then grouped into bands of air quality management capability. The indicator
questions which were developed and applied represent the minimum capability required to
generate air quality information useful for decision-makers, which result in minimum
useful capability.
State of Air pollution Monitoring within Greater Johannesburg
This assesses the ambient air monitoring taking place in a city, as well as
the accuracy, precision and representativeness of the data produced.
Monitoring objectives
- Estimate health and ecosystem impacts in order to identify likely consequences
- Determine compliance with legislation and policy regarding air quality standards
- Provide public information
- Generate information for the formulation of air quality management strategies,
and to monitor the progress of the plans, once implemented.
MONITORING NETWORKS AND OBJECTIVES
Activity
|
Present
|
Network present |
No |
Estimate exposure |
No |
Compliance |
No |
Public
information |
No |
Forecasting |
No |
Spatial
distribution |
No |
Air quality measurement and methodologies
Number of sampling instruments for each compound monitored
NO2 |
SO2 |
PM |
CO |
O3 |
Pb |
1 |
1 |
3 |
|
1 |
3 |
Number of passive, active and continuous sampling instruments
in Johannesburg
NO2 |
SO2 |
PM |
CO |
O3 |
PB |
| P |
A |
C |
P |
A |
C |
P |
A |
C |
P |
A |
C |
P |
A |
C |
P |
A |
| |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
3 |
P = passive A = active C = continuous analysis
Particulate matter monitoring methodologies
Dust fall |
Black smoke |
TSP |
PM10 |
PM2.5 |
| |
|
Low volume
sampler |
|
|
Quality assurance and control
Calibrations and flow checks |
Annual site review |
Data validation |
Five yearly site review |
Inter network comparison |
no |
no |
No |
no |
NA |
Overall score for assessment of the monitoring capability
A quantitative assessment of the monitoring capability of the Greater
Johannesburg Metropolitan Council was provided by the management capability index with a
score of 12 out of 25 which is a moderate score.
DATA ASSESSMENT AND AVAILABILITY INDEX
This assesses how the air quality data is processed to enhance their value and
provide information in a decision-relevant form, as well as the availability of data.
Data Assessment
Simple statistics |
Percentiles |
Compliance |
Trends |
Mapping |
Prediction modelling |
Health studies |
yes |
no |
yes |
yes |
no |
no |
no |
Data dissemination
Internal reports |
Published reports |
Reported in the media |
Air quality alerts issued |
Electronic data communication |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Overall score on data assessment and dissemination
The Greater Johannesburg Metropolitan Council scored approximately 2 points on
the ratio data assessment and availability to measurement indices which indicate the usage
of data being monitored.
EMISSIONS ESTIMATES INDEX
Assessment of emissions inventories conducted to determine the extent to which
decision-relevant information is available about the sources of pollution in the city.
Emissions estimates for major source categories
Industrial |
Mobile |
Domestic/Commercial |
No |
No |
No |
Pollutants for which emissions estimate have been derived
not available
Emissions estimates validity and availability not available
Overall score on emissions estimation capability.
The Greater Johannesburg Metropolitan Council (GJMC) scored no points on the
emissions estimation capability.
MANAGEMENT ENABLING CAPABILITIES INDEX
This assesses the administrative and legislative framework
through which emissions control strategies are introduced and implemented to manage air
quality.
Air quality standards
Acute |
Chronic |
Subject to compliance |
Future amendments planned |
| |
|
|
|
Emission limits and emissions monitoring
Industry |
Cars |
HGVs |
Domestic |
Industry |
Cars |
HGVs |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The GJMC scored 12 out of 25 points on the air quality
management tools required to formulate and implement air quality management strategies.
Overall score for Greater Johannesburg Metropolitan Council
The GJMC scored 38 out of 100 in the overall management capability index which
indicates a need for guidance in the formulation and implementation of air quality
management strategies, as well as the need for capacity building to enhance the
development of monitoring, emissions inventories and data assessment. Without the
development of all the components of an air quality management capability it will be
difficult to meet the recommendations |