National State of the Environment Report - South Africa  
 Main Issues:
Climate
Terrestrial
Water
Marine
Social
Economic
Political
Home page
Logo Home
  This part of the report contains the following sub-sections:
Overview
Introduction
Driving forces
Pressure
State
Impact
Response
Outcome
Linkages
Data issues
Conclusions
References
Indicators
Links


Previous sectionNext section

Data issues

1. There is no centralised digital database for gaseous emissions and air quality in South Africa. The database maintained by the Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism is incomplete and not accessible to the public. The databases on energy consumption previously maintained by the National Energy Council are no longer kept up to date. Data in general are slow to be processed, resulting in the use of information which is several years out-of-date. Future State of the Environment Reports, as well as many other studies, could be much more efficiently executed if all the emissions data required in terms of the air pollution legislation and the UNFCCC obligations on a national basis were held in a single database which was accessible to researchers and policymakers.

2. Air quality data are nominally collected by many local authorities. However, of the 94 stations currently measuring sulphur dioxide, 25 stations in 8 towns have no data, or insufficient data. The usual reason given is lack of human capacity. Political commitment at local level is required to maintain air pollution monitoring systems, and formal and informal training of operators is required.

3. Data from the national sulphur dioxide network are not available as hourly values, which are needed to calculate health impacts. The real-time data stations are not networked or readily accessible. A large fraction of the sulphur dioxide, ozone and nitric oxide data collected nationally is held by private corporations or parastatals such as Eskom. It has not been possible to gain access to most of these data within the period available to this study, despite substantial efforts although there were exceptions. This is partly because there is little culture of data sharing in the interests of public information, and partly because the data volumes are large.

4. Respiratory diseases, the most direct results of poor air quality, are not notifiable in South Africa, therefore no specific conclusions can be made about the incidence of these diseases in certain areas. This information can, therefore, only be determined by epidemiological studies or analyses of clinic and hospital records. Both are expensive and time consuming.

5. There is insufficient monitoring and study of natural or agricultural ecosystems to be able to determine if impacts are occurring due to air pollution or acid deposition.

Top of Page >     Climatic and Atmospheric Changes: Conclusions

There is also information about Climatic and Atmospheric Change in the following reports:
Metropolitan reports:
Arrow Cape Metropolitan Council (1998 edition) Arrow Durban Pilot Study
Arrow Greater Johannesburg Metropolitan Council (1999 edition) Arrow Greater Pretoria Metropolitan Council (1999 edition)

   
Copyright © 1999 Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism. All Rights Reserved.
   Site maintained by the Directorate Environmental Information and Reporting
Last update: October 1999