National State of the Environment Report - South Africa  
 Main Issues:
Climate
Terrestrial
Water
Marine
Social
Economic
Political
Home page
Logo Home
  This part of the report contains the following sub-sections:
Overview
Introduction
Driving forces
Pressure
State
Impact
Response
Outcome
Linkages
Data issues
Conclusions
References
Indicators
Links


Previous sectionNext section

State of freshwater systems and resources in
South Africa: #1

The state of freshwater systems and resources is described under the following headings:
Mean Annual Runoff Groundwater pressure Wetlands Estauries
Rivers Dams and interbasin transfers (IBTs) Water quality  

Mean Annual Runoff (MAR):  Top of Page

South Africa's hydrological regime is characterised by high variability, due to climatic conditions, and low water runoff, due to high absorption by soils (Walmsley 1991).

Figure 3.7 indicates that South Africa has a mean annual precipitation (MAP) to mean annual runoff (MAR) ratio of 8.6%, that is, only 8.6% of the rainfall is available as surface water. This is one of the lowest conversion ratios in the world.

Canada and Australia, which have similar MAP figures, have ratios of 65.7% and 9.8% respectively.

Fig 3.7 Relationship between mean annual runoff and mean annual precipitation.
Figure 3.7 Relationship between mean annual runoff and mean annual precipitation.
Fig 3.8 Distribution of annual surface runoff.

The MAR for South Africa is estimated at 50 150 million m3 a-1. This is not distributed evenly throughout the country, with the Eastern seaboard having high runoff, whilst the western regions tend to have low runoff (Figure 3.8.)

Nor is it consistent over time, with great variability between years (Figure 3.3 a-e).

Figure 3.8 Distribution of annual surface runoff.

Fig 3.3a Annual precipitation for eco-region 1. Fig 3.3b Annual precipitation for eco-region 2.
Figure 3.3a Annual precipitation for eco-region 1. Figure 3.3b Annual precipitation for eco-region 2.
Fig 3.3c Annual precipitation for eco-region 3. Fig 3.3d Annual precipitation for eco-region 4.
Figure 3.3c Annual precipitation for eco-region 3. Figure 3.3d Annual precipitation for eco-region 4.
Fig 3.3e Annual precipitation for eco-region 5.
Groundwater: Top of Page

Similar to surface waters, South Africa'sgroundwater resources are relatively limited compared to world averages Figure 3.9 (E Braune,DWAF pers. comm.)

Figure 3.3e Annual precipitation for eco-region 5.

Fig 3.9 Groundwater harvest potential

Of critical importance is the relationship between groundwater and surface water. Groundwater can only be abstracted on a sustainable basis at a rate less than, or equal to, its long-term average recharge through infiltration of rainwater. Already many of the streams that existed at the beginning of the century have dried up due to over-extraction, and groundwater failure is common in some of the more densely-populated areas (Basson et al. 1997).

Figure 3.9 Groundwater harvest potential

There are an estimated 50 000 new boreholes drilled in South Africa per year by the private sector, but the majority are dry or low yielding (E Braune,DWAF, pers. comm.). Figure 3.10 shows the growth in number of boreholes registered on the National Groundwater Database. The present figure (1999) is 197 811 extant boreholes.

Fig 3.10  Total number of boreholes
Figure 3.10 Total number of boreholes

Wetlands: Top of Page

Wetlands are some of the most threatened aquatic habitats in South Africa (Walmsley 1991) . Threats to wetlands include human development activities, channelisation, drainage, crop production, effluent disposal and water abstraction; that is, most human-induced land-use changes (see Terrestrial Ecosystem section). Begg (1986) states that "wetlands formerly occupied between 10 and 15% of every catchment in Natal.

A wetland
A wetland in South Africa

Within the last fifty years wetlands in these same areas have been reduced to a few scattered remnants, and in certain catchments virtually eliminated". This probably applies to the rest of South Africa, but little information is available about the extent of previously-existing wetland areas.

Fig 3.11  Distribution of wetlands in South Africa.

Even the present DEA&T database on wetlands is limited to 1 377 wetlands as shown in Figure 3.11. Of these, 21% are marine and estuarine, 21% are endorheic pans, 15% are riverine, 5% are lacustrine, 19% are palustrine, and 18% are man-made (Cowan and Van Riet 1998). Of the 829 naturally-occurring freshwater wetlands, 13.5% have full protection within a national park, provincial nature reserve or wildlife sanctuary and 3.9% are partly protected (Cowan and Van Riet 1998).

Figure 3.11 Distribution of wetlands in South Africa

South Africa currently has 16 wetlands designated as wetlands of international importance in accordance with the Ramsar Convention. They are De Hoop Vlei, Barberspan, De Mond State Forest/Heuningnes Estuary, Blesbokspruit, Turtle Beaches/Coral Reefs of Tongaland, St Lucia System, Langebaan, Wilderness Lakes, Verlorenvlei, Orange River Mouth, Kosi Bay system, Lake Sibaya, Natal Drakensberg Park, Ndumo Game Reserve; Seekoeivlei (see Cowan and Marneweck 1996) and Nylsvlei Figure 3.11.Of these, only six are inland, freshwater wetlands.

Estuaries: Top of Page

The present status of estuarine environments is dealt with in the Marine and Coastal section of this report. However, one of the important aspects of the estuarine environment is the amount of freshwater entering the system. River flow through an estuary maintains the salt balance in the estuary and ensures that the estuary mouth remains open.

The environmental water requirements of estuaries as estimated by DWAF (1986) are given in Table 3.3. Where available, data are presented on the present flow through the estuary mouth. The percentage of MAR flowing through the estuary varies considerably for each river, because of aspects such as climatic variability, level of development, land use and river regulation.

Table 3.3 Freshwater characteristics of South Africa's major estuaries (data reliability given in Section 3.9)
Major
river
Virgin MAR of catchment (million m3 a-1)

Total estuarine area (ha)

Evaporative requirement (million m3 a-1)

Flooding requirement (million m3 a-1)

Total requirement (million m3 a-1)

Mean present flow (million m3 a-1)

Present flow as % of virgin MAR
Vaal/
Orange
11 244     534,06 534,06 6783,42 (1995-1997) 60%*
Olifants 1008 648 9,17 66,38 75,55    
Great Berg 913 6085 58,08 69,07 127,15    
Breede 1873 1472 11,84 136,78 148,62    
Gouritz 662 188 1,80 37,73 39,53    
Gamtoos 495 175 1,76 35,04 36,80 78,16 (1968-1970) 16%
Swartkops 100 1163 12,65 6,35 18,99    
Sundays 280 268 3,01 14,28 17,29 169,81 (1994-1996) 61%**
Bushmans 95 1416 12,52 7,34 19,86    
Great Fish 519 199 1,67 36,82 38,49 740,04 (1996 only) 143%
Buffalo 320 861 5,41 21,48 26,88    
Great Kei 1043 298 1,59 74,48 76,07 417,95 (1994-1996) 40%
Mzimkulu 1382 184 0,68 84,76 85,44    
Mgeni 740 449 1,90 154,30 156,20 294,63 (1992-1994) 40%
Tugela 3865     230,00 230,00 2837,20 (1994-1996) 73%
Mfolozi 972 39345 256,65 149,76 406,41    
* Expected to reduce because of the Lesotho Highlands Water Development Scheme
** Augmented from the Fish River.

Top of Page >     Freshwater: State continues: #2

There is also information about Freshwater Systems and Resources in the following reports:
Metropolitan reports:
Arrow Cape Metropolitan Council (1998 edition) Arrow Durban Pilot Study
Arrow Greater Johannesburg Metropolitan Council (1999 edition) Arrow Greater Pretoria Metropolitan Council (1999 edition)

   
Copyright © 1999 Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism. All Rights Reserved.
   Site maintained by the Directorate Environmental Information and Reporting
Last update: October 1999